<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 75 Reasons to Live: Jennifer A. González on Félix González-Torres</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sfmoma.org/2010/06/75-reasons-to-live-jennifer-a-gonzalez-on-felix-gonzalez-torres/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sfmoma.org/2010/06/75-reasons-to-live-jennifer-a-gonzalez-on-felix-gonzalez-torres/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: san</title>
		<link>http://blog.sfmoma.org/2010/06/75-reasons-to-live-jennifer-a-gonzalez-on-felix-gonzalez-torres/comment-page-1/#comment-134629</link>
		<dc:creator>san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=13148#comment-134629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[excellent presentation by professor Jennifer A. Gonzalez. 

I wonder why are US artists who&#039;ve passed away included as representatives of the Venice Biennial?
Not that their work isn&#039;t relevant or not deserve the opportunity to be shared with the public but it is also
in these cases, work that has been validated by the art establishment and not challenging to the artist.
While other countries choose artists who have to prove themselves and don&#039;t always succeed in 
accomplishing strong installations. It is unfair in my perspective because there is no recourse or 
conversation for the artists who&#039;ve passed on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent presentation by professor Jennifer A. Gonzalez. </p>
<p>I wonder why are US artists who&#8217;ve passed away included as representatives of the Venice Biennial?<br />
Not that their work isn&#8217;t relevant or not deserve the opportunity to be shared with the public but it is also<br />
in these cases, work that has been validated by the art establishment and not challenging to the artist.<br />
While other countries choose artists who have to prove themselves and don&#8217;t always succeed in<br />
accomplishing strong installations. It is unfair in my perspective because there is no recourse or<br />
conversation for the artists who&#8217;ve passed on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
