<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As If: Visionary Architecture in the Modern Museum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sfmoma.org/2010/01/as-if/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sfmoma.org/2010/01/as-if/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Discenza</title>
		<link>http://blog.sfmoma.org/2010/01/as-if/comment-page-1/#comment-42408</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Discenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=8240#comment-42408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I am not entirely comfortable with the term visionary, as it implies prophecy and genius rather than the more analytical and speculative qualities that interest me; it can nonetheless serve to mark a range of works that hover around this understanding of architecture’s critical function.&quot;

I agree with this observation; perhaps a better way to describe such works would simply be as &quot;speculative architecture;&quot; it would be more inclusive, but at the same time more accurate...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am not entirely comfortable with the term visionary, as it implies prophecy and genius rather than the more analytical and speculative qualities that interest me; it can nonetheless serve to mark a range of works that hover around this understanding of architecture’s critical function.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with this observation; perhaps a better way to describe such works would simply be as &#8220;speculative architecture;&#8221; it would be more inclusive, but at the same time more accurate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
