http://blog.sfmoma.org/2009/05/one-on-one-julie-charles-on-jasper-johns/ Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://blog.sfmoma.org/2009/05/one-on-one-julie-charles-on-jasper-johns/comment-page-1/#comment-12100 Julian Myers Fri, 22 May 2009 20:43:12 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=2867#comment-12100 I’m with viv on this one. The relationship is common knowledge in art circles, sure, thanks in large part to Katz. But it’s still always euphemized, alluded to, winked at, etc. “The love that dare not speak its name.” “Friends,” “bachelors,” “uncles,” “roommates,” etc. etc. etc. Basta ya!

]]> http://blog.sfmoma.org/2009/05/one-on-one-julie-charles-on-jasper-johns/comment-page-1/#comment-11567 Julie Fri, 15 May 2009 21:38:43 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=2867#comment-11567 Jonathan Katz has written extensively on the relationship between Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg. You can read more about it here: http://www.queer-arts.org/archive/show4/forum/katz/katz_set.html

]]> http://blog.sfmoma.org/2009/05/one-on-one-julie-charles-on-jasper-johns/comment-page-1/#comment-11529 Dix Fri, 15 May 2009 04:32:33 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=2867#comment-11529 Their relationship is pretty out (in wikipedia etc). It’s worth repeating I suppose, but it’s pretty common knowledge.

]]> http://blog.sfmoma.org/2009/05/one-on-one-julie-charles-on-jasper-johns/comment-page-1/#comment-11499 viv Thu, 14 May 2009 17:21:54 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=2867#comment-11499 weren’t johns or rauschenberg lovers at the time (or soon after)? why are they always kept in the closet. come out!!!

]]>