Comments on: Summer and Smoke http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/ Sat, 18 May 2013 06:15:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: viv http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2914 viv Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:30:48 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2914 i would like to think that i have a pretty keen and intact gaydar, and i totally picked up some homoerotic vibes from madame miller. all the queer ladies i know are all about her, too. she’s def. on my list of ‘ladies to hang out in bathtubs taking pictures with.’

]]> By: tammy http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2428 tammy Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:56:47 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2428 my mom’s way hotter than Lee Miller

]]> By: Pickles http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2427 Pickles Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:47:56 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2427 What’s weirdest about this blog post is that the photo of Lee Miller looks STRIKINGLY similar to Ruth Fortin, Tammy’s very own mother. Not kidding.

Homoedipal much?

]]> By: Scott http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2240 Scott Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:45:43 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2240 ha ha ha ha ha ha… Toughskins!!! geez, our moms were cheap.

]]> By: Andrew http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2196 Andrew Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:58:04 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2196 Oh now I get it. I thought the girl-on-girl action was happening within Miller’s photographs. But it is happening among the museum’s patrons. Who are cruisily eroticized by Miller’s cruisey-ass photos. I am never leaving another comment on another world-class art museum’s website’s blog again. Have a Santa Cruzey weekend!! I hate myself!!!!!

]]> By: Andrew http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2195 Andrew Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:55:20 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2195 I am going to read Tammy’s column more frequently than the New York effing times. This is big news!!

Also sorry to be daft but what-all exactly now does it mean for someone to look cruisey? Not Tom Cruisey, ha!? Or I guess it seems like from what you’re saying that for someone to be cruisey means gay people think they’re hot, or iconic. But I always thought cruising was… like… gay people going places to find “partners”??????? So you’re saying Lee Miller…the photographer… in the exhibition…. looks like she’s looking for gay times somewheres????

Oh my god sorry I just expelled myself from the fictional all-girl high school contained within this blog-comment.

Bye!!!!

]]> By: shapiro http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2193 shapiro Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:43:39 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2193 where can i get one of those gaydar guns?

]]> By: reuben http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2192 reuben Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:40:33 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2192 Viva La Tammy!

]]> By: Pickles http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2190 Pickles Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:34:55 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2190 let’s make paper dolls of Lee Miller and Frida and mash them together. we can dress them up in each other’s clothes.

]]> By: Pickles http://blog.sfmoma.org/2008/09/lee-miller-is-cruisey/comment-page-1/#comment-2189 Pickles Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:33:52 +0000 http://blog.sfmoma.org/?p=413#comment-2189 If Lee Miller is not a gay icon, let’s make her one. Starting NOW.

]]>